A three-judge panel, consisting of Diarmuid Fionntain O'Scannlain, N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Charles R. Wolle, Senior District Judge, voted in the case of <a href="http://georgedonnelly.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/08-30385.pdf">U.S. v. Pineda-Moreno, No. 08-30385</a> [PDF] that 
the DEA and other pigs are not expected to get a warrant to trespass on the private property of a driveway to attach a GPS device to someone's vehicle and then follow that person's movements.

You can read all their foolish ideas <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/01/11/08-30385.pdf" target="new">here (a .pdf file) [also </a><a href="http://georgedonnelly.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/08-30385.pdf">here</a>].

So, let's find them, shall we? These nice men want you to know all about where they live, so you can attach a GPS device to their vehicles and follow them around. Or, come visit them with torches and pitchforks, or candle light vigils, or the like, one presumes.

First we go here: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diarmuid_O%27Scannlain" target="new">wikipedia.org/wiki/Diarmuid_O%27Scannlain</a>

And we find out that Diarmuid has chambers in Portland, Oregon.

So, that's a rare name, we visit Whitepages.com and find out sure enough there is a listing.

<blockquote>
Diarmuid O Oscannlain
<br>3919 SW Mount Adams Dr
<br>Portland, OR 97239-1559
<br>Household: Maura O Oscannlain, Caroline Mcdonough
</blockquote>

So we stop by Google maps and <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode&q=3919+SW+Mount+Adams+Dr+Portland%2C+OR+97239&sll=37.0625%2C-95.677068&sspn=47.080837%2C79.013672&ie=UTF8&hq&hnear=3919+SW+Mt+Adams+Dr%2C+Portland%2C+Multnomah%2C+Oregon+97239&z=16" target="new">find his home</a>.

Satellite/aerial view shows that is a very nice house. Across the street, a car is parked on the street. Street view shows some lovely flowers out front, a nice two-story frame home. Gosh, a wood house. Someone who doesn't believe in your reasonable expectation of privacy lives in a wood house.

It isn't completely clear that there would be a driveway, or garage, for each of these houses. There is one just up the street, but I think that's for another house on the hill. Anyway, it would be irony indeed if this despicable judge were parking on the street.

Norman Randy Smith is 60. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N._Randy_Smith" target="new">wikipedia.org/wiki/N._Randy_Smith</a>

It says there that he maintains a residence in Pocatello, Idaho.

And here that residence is:

<blockquote>
Norman R Smith
<br>420 Pebble Ln
<br>Pocatello, ID 83204-3860
<br>(208) 233-0733
<br>Age: 60-64
<br>
<br>Household: Ladean E Smith, Randy Smith,
</blockquote>

<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode&q=20+Pebble+Ln+Pocatello%2C+ID+83204&sll=45.495386%2C-122.700846&sspn=0.001821%2C0.002411&ie=UTF8&hq&hnear=Pebble+Ln%2C+Pocatello%2C+Bannock%2C+Idaho+83204&ll=42.812104%2C-112.397325&spn=0.005635%2C0.009645&t=h&z=17" target="new">[Map]</a>

Pebble Lane has some very nice homes on it, all with garages. And is that a golf course behind the houses? Wow. Very swanky real estate. It must be nice to be a federal judge and get to stifle individual liberty.

It bears mentioning that "Smith" is a fairly common name, and this is not the only Randy Smith in Pocatello. So phone him up before you stop by.

Wolle was a bit harder to find. Visiting <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Robert_Wolle" target="new">wikipedia</a> you might think he was in Iowa. But it turns out that the part to notice is the National 
Judicial College, which is in Reno, Nevada. He seems to be this fellow, living nearby in Gardnerville.

<blockquote>
Charles R Wolle
<br>1030 Lakeside Dr
<br>Gardnerville, NV 89460-9728
<br>Age: 65+
<br>Household: Thomas D Wolle, Susan M Wolle, Kerstin W Wolle
</blockquote>

<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode&q=1030+Lakeside+Dr+Gardnerville%2C+NV+89460&sll=39.23901%2C-119.781935&sspn=0.761564%2C1.234589&ie=UTF8&hq&hnear=1030+Lakeside+Dr%2C+Gardnerville%2C+Douglas%2C+Nevada+89460&ll=38.912282%2C-119.834146&spn=0.005977%2C0.009645&t=h&z=17" target="new">[Map]</a>

Available aerial photo shows it to be a new development, near a golf course. I guess the water rights are in, but the irrigation isn't complete. Say, you try growing a golf course in a desert. Heh. But, money galore, judging by the size of the house and the circular drive. Gee, I wonder if the son of a bitch parks in his driveway.

Anyway, there they are, the current crop of parasites in the government to assault your individual liberty. Their opinion was 
"rendered" back in January, but a larger panel of the 9th Circuit decided to affirm what they chose. I haven't bothered to look for all those people. Do I have to do everything for you?

Best wishes for more freedom when these parasites get jobs in the private sector. Or, anyway, stop infesting your life.

If a bunch of cross-dressers want to attack individual liberty, to hell with them. Because to hell with them. That's exactly as much eloquence as I can muster. I am not burning down their homes, I am not murdering them in their beds. And I am not advocating that any person ever do anything of the sort. But if it were to happen, who would mind? If they were individually and severally dying in a fire, I would not urinate on a single one of them to save their lives.