I‘m talking about solutions, but have I defined the problem? How do you know if the solution works for you if you haven’t explicitly identified the problem it’s meant to solve? We’ve got to keep that horse in front of the cart.
Short and Simple: Aggression
Some people think the ends justify the means. They think aggression is acceptable as long as it is for a good cause. And they dream up a million great causes to fund via their aggression. Admittedly many of them are fine causes – fine enough to be financed voluntarily. But the fact is that bad means always produce bad ends. If we want good, we must be good. In other words, the problem is the idea that aggression is acceptable – and the people who practice it.
Is it more, less than that? Am I all wrong? What problem are you attempting to solve through your liberty activism and education?